Hall v. North Carolina

302 F. App'x 224
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 25, 2008
DocketNo. 08-1726
StatusPublished

This text of 302 F. App'x 224 (Hall v. North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall v. North Carolina, 302 F. App'x 224 (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Darlene Lackey Hall appeals the district court’s order summarily dismissing her complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) for failure to state a claim, for lack of jurisdiction, and as frivolous. In her informal appellate brief, Hall failed to challenge the district court’s reasons supporting the denial of relief. Accordingly, Hall has waived appellate review of those issues. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (“The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
302 F. App'x 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-north-carolina-ca4-2008.