Hall v. New York City Transit Authority
This text of 431 N.E.2d 307 (Hall v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[700]*700OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, judgment reversed, with costs, and the determination of the Impartial Disciplinary Review Board reinstated. There was substantial evidence to sustain the findings of the referee, confirmed by the board, that (1) petitioner was unfit for duty, and (2) petitioner’s refusal to submit to a blood test was not predicated on religious considerations. Nor in view of petitioner’s past disciplinary history can we say that the sanction of dismissal was an abuse of discretion.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
431 N.E.2d 307, 55 N.Y.2d 698, 446 N.Y.S.2d 946, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-ny-1981.