Hall v. New York City Board of Education
This text of 82 A.D.3d 512 (Hall v. New York City Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The verdict was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence (see generally McDermott v Coffee Beanery, Ltd., 9 AD3d 195, 206 [2004]). The jury was presented with conflicting expert testimony and issues respecting infant plaintiffs credibility and its resolution of such issues is entitled to deference (id. at 206-207). Furthermore, the record presents ample evidence from which the jury could fairly infer that infant plaintiff did not sustain any psychological injuries as a result of the incident (see Rivera v City of New York, 40 AD3d 334, 343-344 [2007].) Concur — Saxe, J.P, Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 A.D.3d 512, 918 N.Y.2d 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-new-york-city-board-of-education-nyappdiv-2011.