Hall v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad

119 A.D. 919

This text of 119 A.D. 919 (Hall v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad, 119 A.D. 919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented and voted for reversal on the ground that the plaintiff was guilty Of contributory negligence, as matter Of law (Fiddler v. N. Y. C . & H. R. R. R. Co., 6.4 App. Div. 95; Fealey v. Bull, 163 N. Y. 397; Culhane v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 60 id, 133; Rich v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., [920]*920112 App. Div. 818), and also on the ground that the finding of the jury that the defendant was guilty of negligence which was the proximate 'cause of the accident was contrary to and against the weight of; the evidence, and Robson, J., not voting. ' ■ ! .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fealey v. . Bull
57 N.E. 631 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
American Forcite Powder Manufacturing Co. v. Brady
4 A.D. 95 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Rich v. Pennsylvania Railroad
112 A.D. 818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 A.D. 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-new-york-chicago-st-louis-railroad-nyappdiv-1907.