Hall v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hall v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad

112 A.D. 903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 112 A.D. 903 (Hall v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad, 112 A.D. 903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. McLennan, P. J., and Hash, J., voted for reversal, on the ground that plaintiff, as matter of law, failed to establish freedom from- contributory negligence. Spring and Williams, J J., voted for reversal on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the evidence both as to the negligence of the defendant and contributory negligence of the plaintiff. Kruse, J., dissented and voted for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. McLennan, P. J., and Hash, J., voted for reversal, on the ground that plaintiff, as matter of law, failed to establish freedom from- contributory negligence. Spring and Williams, J J., voted for reversal on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the evidence both as to the negligence of the defendant and contributory negligence of the plaintiff. Kruse, J., dissented and voted for affirmance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A.D. 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-new-york-chicago-st-louis-railroad-nyappdiv-1906.