Hall v. Nelson
This text of 59 N.H. 573 (Hall v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question at issue was, whether the wagon, when attached, was exempt either as a farming tool, or a tool of the plaintiff’s occupation. This was a question of fact to be determined by the referee upon all the evidence, and the finding for the *574 plaintiff was a finding of every material fact upon which the plaintiff’s right of recovery depended. Allard v. Hamilton, 58 N. H. 416; Noyes v. Patrick, 58 N. H. 618; Rice v. Wadsworth, ante 100; Richards v. Hubbard, ante 158; Gceorge v. Fellows, ante 206.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 N.H. 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-nelson-nh-1880.