Hall v. Nelson

59 N.H. 573
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1880·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Stanley, J.

The question at issue was, whether the wagon, when attached, was exempt either as a farming tool, or a tool of the plaintiff’s occupation. This was a question of fact to be determined by the referee upon all the evidence, and the finding for the *574 plaintiff was a finding of every material fact upon which the plaintiff’s right of recovery depended. Allard v. Hamilton, 58 N. H. 416; Noyes v. Patrick, 58 N. H. 618; Rice v. Wadsworth, ante 100; Richards v. Hubbard, ante 158; Gceorge v. Fellows, ante 206.

Exceptions overruled.

Foster, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. Nelson, 59 N.H. 573 (N.H. 1880).

59 N.H. 573 (Hall v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farmers Production Credit Assoc. v. Tarbox
12 Conn. Supp. 460 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 1944)
Farmers Production Credit Assoc. v. Tarbox
12 Conn. Super. Ct. 460 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1944)
Towne v. Marshall
13 A. 648 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1887)