Hall v. MICHIGAN DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

Michigan Supreme Court

Hall v. MICHIGAN DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

706 N.W.2d 740, 2005 Mich. LEXIS 2633, 2005 WL 3446615

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 15, 2005

Docket128968

StatusPublished

This text of 706 N.W.2d 740 (Hall v. MICHIGAN DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. MICHIGAN DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, 706 N.W.2d 740, 2005 Mich. LEXIS 2633, 2005 WL 3446615 (Mich. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

706 N.W.2d 740 (2005)

HALL v. MICHIGAN DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS.

No. 128968.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

December 15, 2005.

Application for leave to appeal.

SC: 128968, COA: 259951.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Attorney General, on behalf of the respondent Department of Corrections, to answer the petitioner's application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order, and to include a statement as to whether petitioner is essentially accurate in his allegation that respondent held petitioner's legal papers until after expiration of the relevant legal deadline.

The application for leave to appeal, including the motion to add issues, remains pending.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

706 N.W.2d 740 (2005)

HALL v. MICHIGAN DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS.

No. 128968.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

December 15, 2005.

Application for leave to appeal.

SC: 128968, COA: 259951.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Attorney General, on behalf of the respondent Department of Corrections, to answer the petitioner's application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order, and to include a statement as to whether petitioner is essentially accurate in his allegation that respondent held petitioner's legal papers until after expiration of the relevant legal deadline.

The application for leave to appeal, including the motion to add issues, remains pending.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

706 N.W.2d 740, 2005 Mich. LEXIS 2633, 2005 WL 3446615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-michigan-dept-of-corrections-mich-2005.