Hall v. Meridian Light & Ry. Co.

76 So. 653, 115 Miss. 760
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1917
StatusPublished

This text of 76 So. 653 (Hall v. Meridian Light & Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall v. Meridian Light & Ry. Co., 76 So. 653, 115 Miss. 760 (Mich. 1917).

Opinions

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

While this declaration contains a great deal of irrelevant matter, it does distinctly allege that the .laying of the second track has resulted in damage to appellants’ property, for which, under Williams v. Meridian Light & Railway Co., 110 Miss. 174, 69 So. 596, they are entitled to recover. The demurrer, therefore, should have been overruled.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Callanan v. . Gilman
14 N.E. 264 (New York Court of Appeals, 1887)
Taylor v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
148 P. 887 (Washington Supreme Court, 1915)
Austin v. Augusta Terminal Railway Co.
34 S.E. 852 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
B'ham Ry. L. & P. Co. v. Smyer
61 So. 354 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1913)
Williams v. Meridian Light & Ry. Co.
69 So. 596 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1915)
Dean v. Southern Ry. Co. in Mississippi
73 So. 55 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1916)
Williams v. City Bank & Trust Co.
186 F. 419 (Fifth Circuit, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 So. 653, 115 Miss. 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-meridian-light-ry-co-miss-1917.