Hall v. MERCY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION
This text of 747 N.W.2d 227 (Hall v. MERCY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jayne A. HALL, Personal Representative of the Estate of Keith Hall, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MERCY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION and Dr. Jeffrey W. Couturier, Defendants, and
Dr. Sudjono Kosim, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals. As opined by the dissenting judge in the Court of Appeals, a remand for consideration of Kirkaldy v. Rim, 478 Mich. 581, 734 N.W.2d 201 (2007), is unnecessary. We REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. The motion for stay is GRANTED. Trial court proceedings are stayed pending the completion of this appeal.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., agrees that a remand to the trial court for consideration *228 of Kirkaldy v. Rim, 478 Mich. 581, 734 N.W.2d 201 (2007), is unnecessary, but would not remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. Rather, she would simply deny leave in all other respects and remand this case to the trial court for reinstatement of its order denying the defendant doctor's motion for summary disposition.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., joins the statement of MARILYN J. KELLY, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
747 N.W.2d 227, 480 Mich. 1184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-mercy-memorial-hospital-corporation-mich-2008.