Hall v. Mem. Hosp. of Union Cty.

Ohio Supreme Court

Hall v. Mem. Hosp. of Union Cty.

861 N.E.2d 143, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1469

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 7, 2007

Docket2006-1943

StatusPublished

This text of 861 N.E.2d 143 (Hall v. Mem. Hosp. of Union Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. Mem. Hosp. of Union Cty., 861 N.E.2d 143, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1469 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Union App. No. 14-06-03, 2006-Ohio-4552. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decision in 2006-1528 and 2006-1589, Hubbell v. Xenia, Greene App. No. 2005 CA 99, 2006-Ohio-3369; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. III. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent. Cupp, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Union App. No. 14-06-03, 2006-Ohio-4552. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decision in 2006-1528 and 2006-1589, Hubbell v. Xenia, Greene App. No. 2005 CA 99, 2006-Ohio-3369; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. III. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent. Cupp, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

861 N.E.2d 143, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-mem-hosp-of-union-cty-ohio-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack