Hall v. Mem. Hosp. of Union Cty.

861 N.E.2d 143, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1469
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 7, 2007·No. 2006-1943·Published

Opinion

Union App. No. 14-06-03, 2006-Ohio-4552. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decision in 2006-1528 and 2006-1589, Hubbell v. Xenia, Greene App. No. 2005 CA 99, 2006-Ohio-3369; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. III. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent. Cupp, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. Mem. Hosp. of Union Cty., 861 N.E.2d 143, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1469 (Ohio 2007).

861 N.E.2d 143 (Hall v. Mem. Hosp. of Union Cty.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. Mem. Hosp. of Union Cty., Unpublished Decision (9-5-2006)
2006 Ohio 4552 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
Hubbell v. City of Xenia
854 N.E.2d 1133 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)