Hall v. McGehee
This text of 34 Tex. 386 (Hall v. McGehee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This suit was improperly brought in the district court. The administration had not been closed, nor the administratrix removed; nor was it made to appear- that there were not -assets in her hands sufficient to pay the debts of the estate. (See articles 1315, 1341 and 1389, Paschal’s Digest.)
The errors complained of in the charge of the court could not affect the case, and therefore constitute no cause for reversal.
The judgment -of the .district court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 Tex. 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-mcgehee-tex-1871.