Hall v. Mazzone

Supreme Court of Alabama

Hall v. Mazzone

622 So. 2d 308, 1993 Ala. LEXIS 421, 1993 WL 134345

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedApril 30, 1993

Docket1911565

StatusPublished

This text of 622 So. 2d 308 (Hall v. Mazzone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. Mazzone, 622 So. 2d 308, 1993 Ala. LEXIS 421, 1993 WL 134345 (Ala. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

KENNEDY, Justice.

On the first appeal of this case, Shirley v. Mazzone, 591 So.2d 469 (Ala.1991), the trial judge was instructed to determine and consider precisely what representation by Mazzone’s attorneys in fact benefited all of the tenants in common, and to adjust its original award accordingly. The order of the trial court dated March 19, 1992, indicates that the court substantially complied with the instruction of this Court. Therefore, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES and HOUSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KENNEDY, Justice.

On the first appeal of this case, Shirley v. Mazzone, 591 So.2d 469 (Ala.1991), the trial judge was instructed to determine and consider precisely what representation by Mazzone’s attorneys in fact benefited all of the tenants in common, and to adjust its original award accordingly. The order of the trial court dated March 19, 1992, indicates that the court substantially complied with the instruction of this Court. Therefore, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES and HOUSTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

622 So. 2d 308, 1993 Ala. LEXIS 421, 1993 WL 134345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-mazzone-ala-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack