Hall v. Maass

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Hall v. Maass

852 P.2d 966, 120 Or. App. 528, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 735

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMay 19, 1993

Docket90C11608; CA A72971

StatusPublished

This text of 852 P.2d 966 (Hall v. Maass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. Maass, 852 P.2d 966, 120 Or. App. 528, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 735 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

[529]*529PER CURIAM

In this habeas corpus proceeding, plaintiff appeals an order allowing defendant’s motion to strike his replication. ORS 34.680(2). We reverse.

In March, 1990, plaintiff suffered a heart attack while incarcerated and was not taken to the hospital for 16 hours. He alleges that he still suffers from serious heart and circulatory problems that are not being treated promptly and that, as a consequence of those delays, he receives constitutionally inadequate medical care. Plaintiff states sufficient facts in support of his claim. ORS 34.362(2). The seriousness of the medical condition and the alleged lack of treatment requires immediate judicial scrutiny, and there is no other timely remedy. ORS 34.362(2). The replication stated a claim for habeas corpus relief.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[529]*529PER CURIAM

In this habeas corpus proceeding, plaintiff appeals an order allowing defendant’s motion to strike his replication. ORS 34.680(2). We reverse.

In March, 1990, plaintiff suffered a heart attack while incarcerated and was not taken to the hospital for 16 hours. He alleges that he still suffers from serious heart and circulatory problems that are not being treated promptly and that, as a consequence of those delays, he receives constitutionally inadequate medical care. Plaintiff states sufficient facts in support of his claim. ORS 34.362(2). The seriousness of the medical condition and the alleged lack of treatment requires immediate judicial scrutiny, and there is no other timely remedy. ORS 34.362(2). The replication stated a claim for habeas corpus relief.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

852 P.2d 966, 120 Or. App. 528, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-maass-orctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack