Hall v. Jordan
This text of 82 U.S. 393 (Hall v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant claimed that a deed offered in evidence was void, because the stamps upon it amounted only to $13 when they should have beeu $13.50. The court admitted the deed, although the act of Congress provided that no deed not properly stamped should be received in evidence. The decision was against the right claimed by the defendant under the act of Congress, and necessarily involved its construction:
However frivolous the objection, it undoubtedly raised a question under the 25th section of the Judiciary Act, the decision of which may be revised in this court upon a writ of error.
Motion to dismiss denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 U.S. 393, 21 L. Ed. 72, 15 Wall. 393, 1872 U.S. LEXIS 1266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-jordan-scotus-1872.