Hall v. Johnson

Fourth Circuit

Hall v. Johnson

472 F. App'x 200

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 30, 2012·No. No. 11-7656·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Douglas Hall appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall v. Johnson, No. 7:11-cv-00143-GRA, 2011 WL 5403347 (D.S.C. Nov. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Douglas Hall appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall v. Johnson, No. 7:11-cv-00143-GRA, 2011 WL 5403347 (D.S.C. Nov. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Hall v. Johnson, 472 F. App'x 200 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

472 F. App'x 200 (Hall v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related