Hall v. Hormel Foods, Corp.

7 F. App'x 541
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 9, 2001
Docket00-2038
StatusUnpublished

This text of 7 F. App'x 541 (Hall v. Hormel Foods, Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall v. Hormel Foods, Corp., 7 F. App'x 541 (8th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pat Hall appeals from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his action brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act, and the Nebraska Act Prohibiting Unjust Discrimination in Employment Because of Age. Upon our de novo review, see Widoe v. Dist. #111 Otoe County Sch., 147 F.3d 726, 728 (8th Cir.1998), we conclude the district court’s judgment was proper for the reasons stated in its thorough opinion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable William G. Cambridge, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska, now retired.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Betty J. Widoe v. District 111 Otoe County School
147 F.3d 726 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 F. App'x 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-hormel-foods-corp-ca8-2001.