Hall v. Holland

699 F. App'x 248
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 24, 2017
DocketNo. 17-6680
StatusPublished

This text of 699 F. App'x 248 (Hall v. Holland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall v. Holland, 699 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marc Pierre Hall, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall v. Holland, No. 5:16-hc-02273-BO (E.D.N.C. May 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
699 F. App'x 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-holland-ca4-2017.