Hall v. Holcombe
This text of 26 Ala. 720 (Hall v. Holcombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—The plea in abatement in this case is clearly bad, and should have been so held upon demurrer.— Athough the former action was brought to recover the same land, it shows that it was brought by other persons than those who are the present plaintiffs. True, the present plaintiffs unite with them ; but this makes no difference : the legal presumption is, that it was properly brought, and hence that it is not brought upon the samo title ; as the rule is, that all the plaintiffs must recover, or none of them can.—1 Chitty’s Pl. 66; Adams on Ej. 299, and notes; Patton v. Crow, at the present term. Assuming, therefore, that the former action is well brought, it is upon a joint right of all the plaintiffs to that suit, — a title different from that to be tried in this suit.
Aside, however, from this objection, the case falls within the decision of this court in Hall and Wife v. Wallace, 25 Ala. Rep. 438.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 Ala. 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-holcombe-ala-1855.