Hall v. Hanscom Air Force Base

71 F. App'x 78
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedAugust 10, 2003
DocketNo. 02-2090
StatusPublished

This text of 71 F. App'x 78 (Hall v. Hanscom Air Force Base) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall v. Hanscom Air Force Base, 71 F. App'x 78 (1st Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a thorough review of the record and of the parties’ submissions, we allow the appellees’ motion for summary disposition. We affirm the lower court’s dismissal on the ground that plaintiffs/appellants failed to satisfy the jurisdictional requirement that they first submit their claim to the appropriate agency in writing. See 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b); Gonzalez v. United States, 284 F.3d 281, 288 (1st Cir.2002)

(“Pursuant to the FTCA, a tort claim against the United States is ‘forever barred’ unless it is presented in writing to the appropriate federal agency within two years after the claim accrues.”) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b)).

Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loe. R. 27(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gonzalez v. United States
284 F.3d 281 (First Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 F. App'x 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-hanscom-air-force-base-ca1-2003.