Hall v. Hall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hall v. Hall

10 A.D.2d 886, 201 N.Y.S.2d 237, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10398

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 886 (Hall v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. Hall, 10 A.D.2d 886, 201 N.Y.S.2d 237, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10398 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by the wife for a separation, the husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 29, 1959, awarding the wife alimony pendente lite and a counsel fee. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. On the record presented, we find no abuse of discretion by the Special [887]*887Term in fixing the amounts of alimony and counsel fee. As we have said in the past, the best protection for a husband in a ease such as this is to seek a speedy trial in which the facts can be fully developed (Leonard v. Leonard, 1 A D 2d 981). Nolan, P. J., Beldovk, Ughetta, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by the wife for a separation, the husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 29, 1959, awarding the wife alimony pendente lite and a counsel fee. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. On the record presented, we find no abuse of discretion by the Special [887]*887Term in fixing the amounts of alimony and counsel fee. As we have said in the past, the best protection for a husband in a ease such as this is to seek a speedy trial in which the facts can be fully developed (Leonard v. Leonard, 1 A D 2d 981). Nolan, P. J., Beldovk, Ughetta, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 886, 201 N.Y.S.2d 237, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-hall-nyappdiv-1960.