Hall v. Hall

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Hall v. Hall

220 S.E.2d 158, 28 N.C. App. 217, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 1721

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedDecember 17, 1975

DocketNo. 7525DC427

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 220 S.E.2d 158 (Hall v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. Hall, 220 S.E.2d 158, 28 N.C. App. 217, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 1721 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

BROCK, Chief Judge.

The order from which defendant has appealed adjudicates fewer than all claims and is not a final judgment as to that claim because the judge did not find there is no just reason for delay. The order is subject to revision at any time before the entry of judgment adjudicating all the claims and the rights and liabilities of all the parties, and therefore is not subject to review by appeal. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54 (b).

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Vaughn and Martin concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROCK, Chief Judge.

The order from which defendant has appealed adjudicates fewer than all claims and is not a final judgment as to that claim because the judge did not find there is no just reason for delay. The order is subject to revision at any time before the entry of judgment adjudicating all the claims and the rights and liabilities of all the parties, and therefore is not subject to review by appeal. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54 (b).

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Vaughn and Martin concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 S.E.2d 158, 28 N.C. App. 217, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 1721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-hall-ncctapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack