Hall v. Hall

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hall v. Hall

378 S.W.3d 422, 2012 WL 4355508, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1188

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 25, 2012·No. No. WD 74618·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Scott Hall appeals the trial court’s judgment that awarded the parties joint legal and physical custody of their children. Father’s eight points on appeal all claim that the trial court; erred in awarding joint legal and physical custody to the parties rather than sole legal and physical custody to him because there is no substantial evidence to support the judgment, it is against the weight of the evidence, it misstates the law, and it misapplies the law, in that the best interests of the children and the statutory factors of section 452.375.2, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, favor sole custody with him. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Scott Hall appeals the trial court’s judgment that awarded the parties joint legal and physical custody of their children. Father’s eight points on appeal all claim that the trial court; erred in awarding joint legal and physical custody to the parties rather than sole legal and physical custody to him because there is no substantial evidence to support the judgment, it is against the weight of the evidence, it misstates the law, and it misapplies the law, in that the best interests of the children and the statutory factors of section 452.375.2, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, favor sole custody with him. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Hall v. Hall, 378 S.W.3d 422, 2012 WL 4355508, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1188 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

378 S.W.3d 422 (Hall v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.