Hall v. Hall
66 Miss. 35
This text of 66 Miss. 35 (Hall v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hall v. Hall, 66 Miss. 35 (Mich. 1888).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The deed offered in evidence by the defendant should have been excluded, and the verdict should have been for the plaintiff.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Avera v. Avera
341 So. 2d 654 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1977)
Cook v. Farley
15 So. 2d 352 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1943)
West Tennessee Co. v. Townes
52 F.2d 764 (N.D. Mississippi, 1931)
Jay v. Michael
48 A. 61 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1900)
Burchard v. Walther
78 N.W. 1061 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1899)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
66 Miss. 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-hall-miss-1888.