Hall v. Hall
66 Miss. 35
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The deed offered in evidence by the defendant should have been excluded, and the verdict should have been for the plaintiff.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hall v. Hall, 66 Miss. 35 (Mich. 1888).
66 Miss. 35 (Hall v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Avera v. Avera
341 So. 2d 654 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1977)
Cook v. Farley
15 So. 2d 352 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1943)
West Tennessee Co. v. Townes
52 F.2d 764 (N.D. Mississippi, 1931)
Jay v. Michael
48 A. 61 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1900)
Burchard v. Walther
78 N.W. 1061 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1899)