Hall v. Hall
This text of 193 A.3d 48 (Hall v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court,
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding the plaintiff in contempt of court based on the wilful violation of a court order?
"2. If the answer to the first question is `yes,' did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the parties' joint motion to open and vacate the judgment of contempt?"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 A.3d 48, 330 Conn. 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-hall-conn-2018.