Hall v. H. E. & W. T. Ry. Co.

121 So. 769, 9 La. App. 582, 1928 La. App. LEXIS 360
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hall v. H. E. & W. T. Ry. Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 La. App. 577
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided November 8, 1928·No. No. 2452·Published

Opinion

REYNOLDS, J.

On the urgent representations of plaintiffs, appellees, that there was error in our opinion and judgment, we granted a rehearing in this case. On ■ reviewing our opinion and judgment we are constrained to adhere to the opinion, that the case is controlled by that of Simms & Sons vs. N. O’. & N. E. R. R. Co., 122 La. 268, 47 So. 602, cited and approved in McHenry Horse Exchange vs. 111. Cent. R. R. Co., 148 La. 49, 86 So. 649.

It is therefore ordered that our former opinion and decree be and it is hereby reinstated and made the opinion and judgment of the court.

WEBB, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. H. E. & W. T. Ry. Co., 121 So. 769, 9 La. App. 582, 1928 La. App. LEXIS 360 (La. Ct. App. 1928).

121 So. 769 (Hall v. H. E. & W. T. Ry. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

J. D. Simms & Sons v. New Orleans & N. E. R.
47 So. 602 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1908)
McHenry Horse Exchange v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.
86 So. 649 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1920)