Hall v. Grant

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 31, 2002
Docket02-7203
StatusUnpublished

This text of Hall v. Grant (Hall v. Grant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall v. Grant, (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7203

VINCENT JOHN HALL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KEVIN GRANT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-02-817)

Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: December 31, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent John Hall, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Vincent John Hall appeals the district court’s order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without

prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies his complaint

asserting denial of a parole hearing. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Hall v. Grant, No. CA-02-817

(D.S.C. July 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hall v. Grant, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-grant-ca4-2002.