Hall v. Granite Run Mall
This text of 459 A.2d 429 (Hall v. Granite Run Mall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The contentions raised by the appellants on this appeal have been fully discussed and decided in Hall v. The Goodman Company, Et al. and Hall v. Alfred Mestichelli and Granite Run Mall, Et al., 310 Pa.Super. 465, 456 A.2d 1029 (consolidated appeals 1983). For the reasons enunciated in Part II A and B therein, we reverse the trial court’s order insofar as it sustained Sears’ demurrer to Granite’s claim for indemnity and we affirm that part of the trial court’s order dismissing Sears as a party in the action against Goodman and Company and Murray H. Goodman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
459 A.2d 429, 313 Pa. Super. 98, 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-granite-run-mall-pasuperct-1983.