Hall v. Graham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hall v. Graham

185 A.D.2d 958, 587 N.Y.S.2d 862, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10123

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 25, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 185 A.D.2d 958 (Hall v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. Graham, 185 A.D.2d 958, 587 N.Y.S.2d 862, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Eileen D. Graham as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 15, 1992, for the Democratic Party position of [959]*959Female Member of the Democratic State Committee from the 58th Assembly District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated August 18, 1992, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the application is granted, and the Board of Elections of the City of New York is directed to strike the petitioner’s name from the appropriate ballot.

Upon our review of the record we find that there are insufficient valid signatures to qualify the petitioner for designation as a candidate pursuant to Election Law § 13-100 (see, L 1992, ch 135, §§ 2, 3). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Eileen D. Graham as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 15, 1992, for the Democratic Party position of [959]*959Female Member of the Democratic State Committee from the 58th Assembly District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated August 18, 1992, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the application is granted, and the Board of Elections of the City of New York is directed to strike the petitioner’s name from the appropriate ballot.

Upon our review of the record we find that there are insufficient valid signatures to qualify the petitioner for designation as a candidate pursuant to Election Law § 13-100 (see, L 1992, ch 135, §§ 2, 3). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 A.D.2d 958, 587 N.Y.S.2d 862, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-graham-nyappdiv-1992.