Hall v. Gilman

63 N.W. 1044, 90 Wis. 455, 1895 Wisc. LEXIS 300
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJune 20, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 63 N.W. 1044 (Hall v. Gilman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall v. Gilman, 63 N.W. 1044, 90 Wis. 455, 1895 Wisc. LEXIS 300 (Wis. 1895).

Opinion

Newman, J.

The time within which an appeal from an order may be taken is limited to thirty days from the date of the service of a copy of the order, with -a written notice-of its entry. R. S. sec. 3042. Jurisdiction can be conferred upon this court only by an appeal taken within the time and in the manner provided b'y law. Jurisdiction upon appeal is jurisdiction of subject matter. It is conferred by compliance with the law regulating appeals, and cannot be conferred by consent. So, the time within which an appeal is authorized cannot be extended by consent of the parties; nor has the court power to enlarge the time for taking an appeal. R. S. sec. 2831; Herrick v. Racine W. & D. Co. 43 Wis. 93; Palmer v. Peterson, 46 Wis. 401. No doubt the time Avithin Avhich an appeal may be taken from an order is, in a certain sense, Avithin the power of the party in Avhose favor the order is. He has an option when, or whether, he will set the statute to running by service of the notice. But, having exercised his option, and the time having once commenced to run, he has no further power over it. The law then determines it. The time is determined absolutely by the service of the notice. Leadbetter v. Laird, 45 Wis. 522; Sambs v. Stein, 53 Wis. 569.

By the GovM.— The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Attorney General v. Fasekas
269 N.W. 700 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1937)
Filer & Stowell Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
155 N.W. 118 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1915)
Haessly v. Secor
116 N.W. 175 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 N.W. 1044, 90 Wis. 455, 1895 Wisc. LEXIS 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-gilman-wis-1895.