Hall v. Gerken
This text of 89 N.Y.S. 171 (Hall v. Gerken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order in this case is too broad, and requires-particulars to be stated with which the defendant evidently cannot make compliance. The order should be modified by requiring the defendant to state between what dates he suffered loss of profits by reason of the plaintiff’s acts, and the aggregate amount thereof; "and, as sq modified, the order should be affirmed, without costs to either party in this court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 N.Y.S. 171, 96 A.D. 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-gerken-nyappdiv-1904.