Hall v. Gerken

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hall v. Gerken

89 N.Y.S. 171, 96 A.D. 632

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 13, 1904·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order in this case is too broad, and requires-particulars to be stated with which the defendant evidently cannot make compliance. The order should be modified by requiring the defendant to state between what dates he suffered loss of profits by reason of the plaintiff’s acts, and the aggregate amount thereof; "and, as sq modified, the order should be affirmed, without costs to either party in this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order in this case is too broad, and requires-particulars to be stated with which the defendant evidently cannot make compliance. The order should be modified by requiring the defendant to state between what dates he suffered loss of profits by reason of the plaintiff’s acts, and the aggregate amount thereof; "and, as sq modified, the order should be affirmed, without costs to either party in this court.

Hall v. Gerken, 89 N.Y.S. 171, 96 A.D. 632 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

89 N.Y.S. 171 (Hall v. Gerken) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.