Hall v. . Dew

1 N.C. 745
CourtCourt of King's Bench
DecidedJuly 5, 1793
StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 745 (Hall v. . Dew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall v. . Dew, 1 N.C. 745 (kingsbench 1793).

Opinion

It is well enough. He says it was according to the statute, and if the deed was not enrolled before the rent day, the other party should show it. 4 Rep., Hind's case. It would be wrong if the bargainee was not to have the rent incurred before the enrollment. The *Page 746 law has always been so understood, and it has been so adjudged on solemn argument. 5 Jac., Alsop's case. Tr., 20 Car. rot., 1420. One declared on a lease of the 24th of March, habend., abinde per ann. rendering rent atMichaelmas, and the Annunciation; objected that the last Annunciation is not within the year. Sed non allocatur, quia abinde shall be taken exclusive of the day. 3 Roll., 521; Bendl., 187.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-dew-kingsbench-1793.