Hall v. Detroit Forming, Inc.
This text of 748 N.W.2d 886 (Hall v. Detroit Forming, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Darryl HALL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
DETROIT FORMING, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 8, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARKMAN, J., concurs in part and dissents in part and states as follows:
With regard to the `failure to promote' claim, I would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the trial court's order granting defendant's motion for summary disposition for the reasons stated in part II of the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion. I would affirm the *887 judgment of the Court of Appeals on the `hostile environment' claim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
748 N.W.2d 886, 481 Mich. 885, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 1138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-detroit-forming-inc-mich-2008.