Hall v. Davis
This text of 73 Ga. 101 (Hall v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Davis, receiver of Welch & Bacon, proceeded to foreclose a mortgage on certain land, against W'. J. Hall. Defendant filed a plea, in brief, as follows: The land of which that involved in this suit was a part was purchased by defendant’s father, W. W. Hall, and one Rut-land, jointly, and a deed" taken in the name of Rutland. On a division, the mortgaged land fell to the share- of defendant’s father'. There was a judgment outstanding against him at the time, and Welch & Bacon were afraid it would interfere with the collection of their claim against him." They induced defendant, who was young and inexperienced, to take a deed from Rutland in his name and give the mortgage to- them, assuring him that they would not hurt him, and' promising that W. W. Hall should also sign the notes and mortgage; that he was then absent, and never authorized the mortgage or the taking of the deed by defendant, and always claimed the land and does so yet; that there was no consideration for this defendant to sign [102]*102the notes or mortgage; that he did not and never had owed the debt to Welch & Bacon; and that he had been fraudulently induced by them to sign without consideration, on the assurances and promises stated; and that W. W. Hall was insolvent.
On demurrer, these pleas were stricken, and a rule absolute was granted. Defendant excepted.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 Ga. 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-davis-ga-1884.