Hall v. Curtis

39 La. Ann. 504
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 15, 1887
DocketNo. 9957
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 39 La. Ann. 504 (Hall v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall v. Curtis, 39 La. Ann. 504 (La. 1887).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Fenner, J.

A motion is made to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction thereof, because the amount in dispute does not exceed two thousand dollars.

We think the appeal has no place in our Court.

The action is to recover :

1st. Two lots of ground valued at..........................$1,000

2d. Rents and revenues thereof, valued at.................. 260

3d. Certain personal property or its value, yalued at........ 300

4th. Injury and waste of improvements, valued at........... 150

the whole amounting to......................................$1,710

To this is added a roving allegation that “ by said fraudulent and illegal possession of said property * * petitioners have been damaged in the full sum of five hundred dollars.”

Inasmuch as this allegation is supported by no specification of the nature of the pretended damage, and as every reasonable cause of in[505]*505jury had been set forth in the previous particular claims, we must treat this last claim as merely fictitious and entitled to no consideration as forming part of the real matter in dispute, which is thus below the limit of our jurisdiction.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fontenot v. Laudeau
182 So. 125 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1938)
Wagner v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.
91 So. 817 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 La. Ann. 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-curtis-la-1887.