Hall v. Commonwealth
This text of 12 A. 163 (Hall v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
None of the assignments of error in this case can be sustained. 'The exceptions relating to the challenge of jurors are not novel, and similar ones have been passed upon so frequently by this court, that further discussion of them would be to no purposed On the question of the prisoner’s insanity, the rulings and charge ■of the learned judge of the court below are unexceptionable.
The judgment of the Court of Oyer and Terminer is affirmed; and it is ordered that the record be remitted to that eourt, for the purposes of execution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 A. 163, 9 Sadler 279, 22 Week. No. 25, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-commonwealth-pa-1888.