Hall v. Canary

New York Court of Common Pleas

Hall v. Canary

17 N.Y.S. 950, 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 970, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 611

New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided February 1, 1892·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only exceptions which appear in the record of this appeal and are urged for reversal of the judgment are those taken to the trial justice’s exclusion of certain questions addressed to the witnesses by defend[951] ant’s counsel under objection by plaintiff’s counsel. These questions were so palpably incompetent that it seems a mere waste of time to discuss the exceptions taken to their exclusion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The only exceptions which appear in the record of this appeal and are urged for reversal of the judgment are those taken to the trial justice’s exclusion of certain questions addressed to the witnesses by defend[951] ant’s counsel under objection by plaintiff’s counsel. These questions were so palpably incompetent that it seems a mere waste of time to discuss the exceptions taken to their exclusion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Hall v. Canary, 17 N.Y.S. 950, 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 970, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 611 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Pincite

17 N.Y.S. 950 (Hall v. Canary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.