Hall v. California
292 U.S. 614, 54 S. Ct. 869
Opinion
The appeal herein is dismissed (1) for the want of a properly presented federal question, Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U.S. 341, 343, 344; Appleby v. Buffalo, 221 U.S. 524, 529; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U.S. 692, 700; and (2) for the reason that the decision of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Mims, 242 U.S. 532, 535; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. McGrew, 188 U.S. 291, 308; Hartford Life Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 249 U.S. 490, 493.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hall v. California, 292 U.S. 614, 54 S. Ct. 869 (1934).
292 U.S. 614 (Hall v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hall v. People of State of California
79 F.2d 132 (Ninth Circuit, 1935)