Hall v. California

Supreme Court

Hall v. California

292 U.S. 614, 54 S. Ct. 869

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 4, 1934

DocketNo. 1075

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 292 U.S. 614 (Hall v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. California, 292 U.S. 614, 54 S. Ct. 869 (1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed (1) for the want of a properly presented federal question, Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U.S. 341, 343, 344; Appleby v. Buffalo, 221 U.S. 524, 529; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U.S. 692, 700; and (2) for the reason that the decision of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Mims, 242 U.S. 532, 535; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. McGrew, 188 U.S. 291, 308; Hartford Life Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 249 U.S. 490, 493.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed (1) for the want of a properly presented federal question, Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U.S. 341, 343, 344; Appleby v. Buffalo, 221 U.S. 524, 529; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U.S. 692, 700; and (2) for the reason that the decision of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Mims, 242 U.S. 532, 535; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. McGrew, 188 U.S. 291, 308; Hartford Life Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 249 U.S. 490, 493.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 U.S. 614, 54 S. Ct. 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-california-scotus-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack