Hall v. Burney

Fourth Circuit

Hall v. Burney

561 F. App'x 293

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 26, 2014·No. No. 13-2084·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vincent John Hall appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hall’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall v. Burney, No. 7:10-cv-00184-BO, 2013 WL 4828570 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vincent John Hall appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hall’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall v. Burney, No. 7:10-cv-00184-BO, 2013 WL 4828570 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hall v. Burney, 561 F. App'x 293 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

561 F. App'x 293 (Hall v. Burney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related