Hall v. Bray

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Hall v. Bray

1 N.J.L. 245

DecidedApril 15, 1794

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.J.L. 245 (Hall v. Bray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. Bray, 1 N.J.L. 245 (N.J. 1794).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Cur.

Such an agreement is no revocation at law. An intention to sell does hot revoke a will by which the property is devised. In equity, perhaps, it may be considered as an absolute disposition. Powell on Dev. 565, 593 — 4; Abney v. [213] Miller, 2 Atk. 593; Rider v. Wager, 2 P. Wms. 328; Cotter v. Layer, Ibid. 623; Willet v. Sandford, 1 Vesey 177; Vernon v. Jones, 2 Vern. 241 ; Prec, in Chey.32; Archer v. Bokenham, 11 Mod. 148. See 1 Bl. Rep. 349.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cur.

Such an agreement is no revocation at law. An intention to sell does hot revoke a will by which the property is devised. In equity, perhaps, it may be considered as an absolute disposition. Powell on Dev. 565, 593 — 4; Abney v. [213] Miller, 2 Atk. 593; Rider v. Wager, 2 P. Wms. 328; Cotter v. Layer, Ibid. 623; Willet v. Sandford, 1 Vesey 177; Vernon v. Jones, 2 Vern. 241 ; Prec, in Chey.32; Archer v. Bokenham, 11 Mod. 148. See 1 Bl. Rep. 349.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.J.L. 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-bray-nj-1794.