Hall v. Boykin

190 S.E. 228, 211 N.C. 391, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 100
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 17, 1937·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Oubiam.

The exception to the directed verdict is well taken. Plaintiff offered no evidence under the court’s ruling, which was erroneous, and the verdict is unsupported by the record. Hayes v. Green, 187 N. C., 776, 123 S. E., 7; Bank v. School Committee, 121 N. C., 107, 28 S. E., 134.

New trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. Boykin, 190 S.E. 228, 211 N.C. 391, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 100 (N.C. 1937).

190 S.E. 228 (Hall v. Boykin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. Boykin
214 N.C. 830 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)