Hall v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

906 P.2d 309, 138 Or. App. 177, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1648
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 29, 1995·No. CA A84472·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board), arguing that the Board erred in imposing a parole supervision term of 163 months based on ORS 144.085(l)(c). Petitioner argues that the statute is not applicable because his crimes were committed in May 1987, and the statute applies only to crimes committed after September 29, 1991. We agree. Fernandez v. Board of Parole, 137 Or App 247, 904 P2d 1071 (1995).

Petitioner also argues that the Board’s retroactive application of the sexual offender notification statute to him was a violation of the state and federal ex post facto clauses. We disagree. Williford v. Board of Parole, 137 Or App 254, 904 P2d 1074 (1995). Petitioner’s remaining assignments of error do not require discussion.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 906 P.2d 309, 138 Or. App. 177, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1648 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).

906 P.2d 309 (Hall v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williford v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
904 P.2d 1074 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)
Fernandez v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
904 P.2d 1071 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)