Hall v. Ball

162 Ohio St. (N.S.) 299
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 8, 1954
DocketNo. 33830
StatusPublished

This text of 162 Ohio St. (N.S.) 299 (Hall v. Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall v. Ball, 162 Ohio St. (N.S.) 299 (Ohio 1954).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed on authority of Campbell, Exr., v. Lloyd, ante, 203, and for the reasons therein expressed.

Judgment reversed.

Weygandt, C. J., Taet, Zimmerman and Lamneck, JJ., concur. Middleton and Stewart, JJ., dissent. Hart, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 Ohio St. (N.S.) 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-ball-ohio-1954.