Hall v. Armando

3 N.Y.S. 946, 16 N.Y. St. Rep. 1017, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 981

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The action in the Fourth district court being for the claim and delivery of personal property, the counter-claim for work, labor, and services was properly disregarded, as another action can be brought for that counter-claim. We cannot see that any error was committed by the justice in the trial, and the judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs.