Hall v. Armando
3 N.Y.S. 946, 16 N.Y. St. Rep. 1017, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 981
This text of 3 N.Y.S. 946 (Hall v. Armando) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hall v. Armando, 3 N.Y.S. 946, 16 N.Y. St. Rep. 1017, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 981 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).
Opinion
The action in the Fourth district court being for the claim and delivery of personal property, the counter-claim for work, labor, and services was properly disregarded, as another action can be brought for that counter-claim. We cannot see that any error was committed by the justice in the trial, and the judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 N.Y.S. 946, 16 N.Y. St. Rep. 1017, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-armando-nyctcompl-1888.