Hall v. Arlington County

Fourth Circuit

Hall v. Arlington County

585 F. App'x 52

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 23, 2014

DocketNo. 14-1469

StatusPublished

This text of 585 F. App'x 52 (Hall v. Arlington County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. Arlington County, 585 F. App'x 52 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Hall appeals the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing with prejudice his civil action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall v. Arlington Cnty., VA, No. 1:13-cv-00656-AJT-TRJ (E.D.Va. filed Apr. 8, 2014, entered Apr. 9, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Hall appeals the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing with prejudice his civil action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall v. Arlington Cnty., VA, No. 1:13-cv-00656-AJT-TRJ (E.D.Va. filed Apr. 8, 2014, entered Apr. 9, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

585 F. App'x 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-arlington-county-ca4-2014.