Hall v. Air Force
This text of Hall v. Air Force (Hall v. Air Force) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Not For Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 02-2090
LOIS R. HALL, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs, Appellants,
v.
HANSCOM AIR FORCE BASE, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. George A. O'Toole, Jr., U.S. District Judge]
Before
Boudin, Chief Judge, Lynch and Howard, Circuit Judges.
Lois R. Hall on brief pro se. Gina Y. Walcott-Torres, Assistant United States Attorney, and Michael J. Sullivan, United States Attorney, on brief for appellees.
August 18, 2003 Per Curiam. After a thorough review of the record and of
the parties' submissions, we allow the appellees' motion for
summary disposition. We affirm the lower court's dismissal on the
ground that plaintiffs/appellants failed to satisfy the
jurisdictional requirement that they first submit their claim to
the appropriate agency in writing. See 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b);
Gonzalez v. United States, 284 F.3d 281, 288 (1st Cir. 2002)
("Pursuant to the FTCA, a tort claim against the United States is
'forever barred' unless it is presented in writing to the
appropriate federal agency within two years after the claim
accrues.") (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b)).
Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27(c).
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hall v. Air Force, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-air-force-ca1-2003.