Hall v. Abbey
This text of 172 F. App'x 154 (Hall v. Abbey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for the well-stated reasons set forth in the order of the district court filed March 26, 2004. Additionally, the district court did not abuse its discretion in deciding not to hear oral argument on the summary judgment motion.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 F. App'x 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-abbey-ca9-2006.