Hall Mammoth Incubator Co. v. Stanbery

95 A. 609, 88 N.J.L. 370, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 329
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 15, 1915
StatusPublished

This text of 95 A. 609 (Hall Mammoth Incubator Co. v. Stanbery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall Mammoth Incubator Co. v. Stanbery, 95 A. 609, 88 N.J.L. 370, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 329 (N.J. 1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison', Swayze, Parker, Mikturst, Kalisch, YredefBURGH, HeEPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, JJ. 10.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 A. 609, 88 N.J.L. 370, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-mammoth-incubator-co-v-stanbery-nj-1915.