Hall, David & Joseph, P.A. v. Fischette

832 So. 2d 810, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15558, 2002 WL 31395935
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 25, 2002
DocketNo. 1D02-400
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 832 So. 2d 810 (Hall, David & Joseph, P.A. v. Fischette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall, David & Joseph, P.A. v. Fischette, 832 So. 2d 810, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15558, 2002 WL 31395935 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon motion by Appellees, this case is summarily affirmed because the transcript of the November 30, 2001 hearing, which is the subject of this appeal, has not been transmitted to the court as required by its May 2, 2002 order granting leave to supplement the record with the transcript. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979)(rul-ing that the “trial court should have been affirmed because the record brought forward by the appellant is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error”).

AFFIRMED.

DAVIS and POLSTON, JJ„ concur; BENTON, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chicago Title Ins. Co. v. Alday-Donalson Title Co. of Fla., Inc.
832 So. 2d 810 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
832 So. 2d 810, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15558, 2002 WL 31395935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-david-joseph-pa-v-fischette-fladistctapp-2002.