Hall County v. Hulsey

26 Ga. App. 603
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 27, 1920·No. 12071·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The motion to dismiss the writ of error is denied.

2. This being the first grant of a new trial, and the evidence, including the alleged newly discovered evidence, not demanding the verdict returned, this court will not interfere.

3. The defendant brought the case- here, complaining of the first grant of a new trial, and also assigning error upon exceptions pendente lite to interlocutory rulings, including exceptions to the allowance-of amendments to the plaintiff’s petition and to the overruling of general and special demurrers to the petition. The judgment granting a new trial being affirmed, the case is still pending in the lower court, and this court cannot now consider and determine the questions made by the pendente-lite exceptions. Armour v. Burkhalter, 130 Ga. 370 (60 S. E. 850), and citations.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke cmd Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall County v. Hulsey, 26 Ga. App. 603 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

26 Ga. App. 603 (Hall County v. Hulsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Armour & Co. v. Burkhalter
60 S.E. 850 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)