Hall, Charles Ray

Opinion

§§ ,'3)5 /0/ /

- ' 1. +/ wm ` §§§6@€;@'@@¢“¢@1@@@§&\§ cHARLES HALL_JR; 4 ; @Cj ()5 2015 1421116 _‘ . ~ . §cl)€azlx §z.\;li€;)g< §6367 A\D@%A©@Si@,©“@?k

ALLRED UNIT ' _- ' DATE:9-29.-15v

cOURT oF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O.BOX 12308,CAP1TOL STATION- AUSTIN,TEXAS 78711 RE: oBJEcTION TO'wHiTE CARD DENIAL [CAUSE NO.54218-D]AND[€AUSE~N0.54219-D]

POINTS GF ERRORS TO BE RAISED UNDER FIRST IMPRESSION

(l)_JURISDICTION - PAGE GNE CF ONE [4th,l4th CONST;AMEND.VIOLATION]

(2) ILLEGAL'CONFINEHENT'~FAGE ONE GF`TWO-{CONST.VIOLATION'UNDER"TITLEZBU.S-C.§§224l(39 (3)DOUBLE_JEOPARDY -CONTINUATIGN PAGE TWO OF'THREE[§Eh,€Ch,8£h,llth,&l4th COnSt-amend.] (4)UNLAWFUL & ILLEGAL ENACTMENT OF THE`[AEDPA][U.S;C.A. CONST.VIGLATION UNDER ARTICLE

DATE; NOVEMBER 5 2014 28§§2241(3)1.€.TEXAS'CONST.ART.I§§lQ.]

I;AM RAISING AN OBJECTION TO THESE quTE cARDS wITHOUT A wRITTEN ORDER.I HAVE A (RIGHT) TO A [FAIR AND PROPER INQUIRY.]

'CONCLUSION§"IF I WOULD HAVE“HAD A PROPER INQUIRY,WHAT WOULD THE PROPER OUTCOME HAVE BEEN?WOULD 1 HAVE GONE BACK TO COURT ORWHAT?WHAT IS'THE'REASON FOR (DENIAL)?

RESPECTFULL! SUBMITTED cHARLES HALL_JR. #1421116

CC FILE